TY - GEN
T1 - A Novel Yardstick of Learning Time Spent in a Programming Language by Unpacking Bloom’s Taxonomy
AU - Tello, Alcides Bernardo
AU - Wu, Ying Tien
AU - Perry, Tom
AU - Yu-Pei, Xu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Instead of testing students, measuring precisely the total learning time spent by a student is of preponderant importance. Therefore, the goal of this article is to demonstrate the estimation of the time each student requires in mastering any topic content, until they become an expert. We have developed empirical evidence for this estimate based on Bloom’s taxonomy in a concrete case study at an engineering school by teaching loops in Python. Our result has shown that, on average, 4.98 hours are demanded in the “loop” lesson to reach the top level of Bloom’s taxonomy immediately after a half-hour lecture. Supported by Bloom’s taxonomy and the forgetting curve theory, the results of this study suggest that every student needs a different amount of time to master a topic via immediate post-lecture review, climbing the six levels of the aforementioned taxonomy; all pupils can learn and master anything at high levels but at very different rates. Schools should also readjust study plans to concentrate more time on level three and four of the taxonomy which demands the doing, designing, building and developing a particular domain of knowledge.
AB - Instead of testing students, measuring precisely the total learning time spent by a student is of preponderant importance. Therefore, the goal of this article is to demonstrate the estimation of the time each student requires in mastering any topic content, until they become an expert. We have developed empirical evidence for this estimate based on Bloom’s taxonomy in a concrete case study at an engineering school by teaching loops in Python. Our result has shown that, on average, 4.98 hours are demanded in the “loop” lesson to reach the top level of Bloom’s taxonomy immediately after a half-hour lecture. Supported by Bloom’s taxonomy and the forgetting curve theory, the results of this study suggest that every student needs a different amount of time to master a topic via immediate post-lecture review, climbing the six levels of the aforementioned taxonomy; all pupils can learn and master anything at high levels but at very different rates. Schools should also readjust study plans to concentrate more time on level three and four of the taxonomy which demands the doing, designing, building and developing a particular domain of knowledge.
KW - Bloom’s taxonomy
KW - Learning-time spent
KW - Loop
KW - Programming language
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088530297&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-52249-0_53
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-52249-0_53
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85088530297
SN - 9783030522483
T3 - Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
SP - 785
EP - 794
BT - Intelligent Computing - Proceedings of the 2020 Computing Conference
A2 - Arai, Kohei
A2 - Kapoor, Supriya
A2 - Bhatia, Rahul
PB - Springer
T2 - Science and Information Conference, SAI 2020
Y2 - 16 July 2020 through 17 July 2020
ER -